<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Servitium elearning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Shaping learning through ideas...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Creating Effective Assessment Items by Viplav Baxi</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/creating-effective-assessment-items/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Viplav Baxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/?p=14#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great post, Sujoy! You may enjoy researching Item Response Theory specially for objective type questions.

What are the principles behind designing assessments (collection of items)? Are there specific ways in which items should be put together or sectioned?

One of the other things I am researching is around the use of assessments in networked social learning. I came across ratings systems and something called soft peer review. Would love to hear your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great post, Sujoy! You may enjoy researching Item Response Theory specially for objective type questions.</p>
<p>What are the principles behind designing assessments (collection of items)? Are there specific ways in which items should be put together or sectioned?</p>
<p>One of the other things I am researching is around the use of assessments in networked social learning. I came across ratings systems and something called soft peer review. Would love to hear your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introduction to Instructional Design Theories by Saritha Divakaran</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/introduction-to-instructional-design-theories/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Saritha Divakaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/introduction-to-instructional-design-theories/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Thank you Swati for the nice read. It was informative. :)
I just wanted to add my thoughts to it. 

Why’s and How’s of LEARNING

Sometimes I wonder why my teacher used to ask me to draw a house on a sheet of paper and what made me decide on its size?   And do you realize why some people at the age of 70 remember the person they loved at 17? But, there are times when you don’t even remember your uncle’s name whom you met 10 years ago?   Do you also remember how you used to learn rhymes by repetitive recitation AND you still remember some of those! So, is ‘Twinkle Twinkle little star’, memories of your childhood friend, and the house flashing across your mind?

Well, the answers to these lie in two simple words – Learning and Experience. Experts proposed three main approaches to learning that explains the phenomenon of Learning. So, let us look at these interesting theories to get answers to some of our intriguing queries.

1. Behaviorism
According to this theory, learning is all about change in behavior. It states:
1.1 We learn by repetition – For example, repetitive recitation of rhymes.
1.2 We learn faster when awarded or appreciated - This is known as Positive Reinforcement.
1.3 We avoid repeating the act for which we are punished - This is known as Negative Reinforcement.

2. Cognitivism
According to this theory, all our learning initially takes place in our mind. For example, when we learn driving, we first concentrate only on the road and get distracted by music or talking. However, as we get used to driving or when we become experts, driving for us becomes a psychomotor skill rather than cognitive skill.
Another important and interesting theory is The Schema Theory by Jean Piaget. According to this theory, human mind is a web of related information and its a dynamic changing mass of knowledge. In other words, related concepts are connected to each other. For example, when we learn or read about something new, say ‘animal’, we classify it or store it in one section of our brain. Similarly, when we learn about ‘Tiger’, we try and relate this with the existing information ‘animal’. Now, when we read about carnivorous and herbivorous animals, we connect this with the ‘Tiger’ and ’animal’ information that is stored in our brain. So, you can see how the schema grows in our minds continuously.

However, if a schema is not updated with any new information or if we forget about it, the schema in our brain gets lost. This is the reason why we forget our uncle’s name.  

But, if we keep updating the schema, it keeps growing and does not get lost – as in the animal example.
Also, sometimes we leave a schema for a long time. In this case, the schema may not get lost as we are holding on to it. This is the reason why we remember the name of the person we loved so many years ago. 
 
3. Constructivism
This is also an extension of the Cognitivism theory. According to the constructivism theory, We construct our own perception of life based on our experiences or our environment. We also create our own different world, give a different meaning to life or incidents, or fill our own colors. As a result, we think, learn, act, and behave differently. This is the reason why we draw houses with different sizes and colors. 

I hope I made you think and instill some curiosity that would push you to explore the working of human mind. So, lets get started!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Swati for the nice read. It was informative. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I just wanted to add my thoughts to it. </p>
<p>Why’s and How’s of LEARNING</p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder why my teacher used to ask me to draw a house on a sheet of paper and what made me decide on its size?   And do you realize why some people at the age of 70 remember the person they loved at 17? But, there are times when you don’t even remember your uncle’s name whom you met 10 years ago?   Do you also remember how you used to learn rhymes by repetitive recitation AND you still remember some of those! So, is ‘Twinkle Twinkle little star’, memories of your childhood friend, and the house flashing across your mind?</p>
<p>Well, the answers to these lie in two simple words – Learning and Experience. Experts proposed three main approaches to learning that explains the phenomenon of Learning. So, let us look at these interesting theories to get answers to some of our intriguing queries.</p>
<p>1. Behaviorism<br />
According to this theory, learning is all about change in behavior. It states:<br />
1.1 We learn by repetition – For example, repetitive recitation of rhymes.<br />
1.2 We learn faster when awarded or appreciated &#8211; This is known as Positive Reinforcement.<br />
1.3 We avoid repeating the act for which we are punished &#8211; This is known as Negative Reinforcement.</p>
<p>2. Cognitivism<br />
According to this theory, all our learning initially takes place in our mind. For example, when we learn driving, we first concentrate only on the road and get distracted by music or talking. However, as we get used to driving or when we become experts, driving for us becomes a psychomotor skill rather than cognitive skill.<br />
Another important and interesting theory is The Schema Theory by Jean Piaget. According to this theory, human mind is a web of related information and its a dynamic changing mass of knowledge. In other words, related concepts are connected to each other. For example, when we learn or read about something new, say ‘animal’, we classify it or store it in one section of our brain. Similarly, when we learn about ‘Tiger’, we try and relate this with the existing information ‘animal’. Now, when we read about carnivorous and herbivorous animals, we connect this with the ‘Tiger’ and ’animal’ information that is stored in our brain. So, you can see how the schema grows in our minds continuously.</p>
<p>However, if a schema is not updated with any new information or if we forget about it, the schema in our brain gets lost. This is the reason why we forget our uncle’s name.  </p>
<p>But, if we keep updating the schema, it keeps growing and does not get lost – as in the animal example.<br />
Also, sometimes we leave a schema for a long time. In this case, the schema may not get lost as we are holding on to it. This is the reason why we remember the name of the person we loved so many years ago. </p>
<p>3. Constructivism<br />
This is also an extension of the Cognitivism theory. According to the constructivism theory, We construct our own perception of life based on our experiences or our environment. We also create our own different world, give a different meaning to life or incidents, or fill our own colors. As a result, we think, learn, act, and behave differently. This is the reason why we draw houses with different sizes and colors. </p>
<p>I hope I made you think and instill some curiosity that would push you to explore the working of human mind. So, lets get started!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do we require our own Quality framework? by Shaleen</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Nice and refreshing read. 

My limited understanding says that most of the quality frame works are plagued by one size fits all.

All leading organizations, such as GE, Motorola, and Sony, known for their quality have adopted some industry-specific framework and modified it for their use.

We have a budding learning framework called WHO WHAT HOW. Let us see how we can fit this in that framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and refreshing read. </p>
<p>My limited understanding says that most of the quality frame works are plagued by one size fits all.</p>
<p>All leading organizations, such as GE, Motorola, and Sony, known for their quality have adopted some industry-specific framework and modified it for their use.</p>
<p>We have a budding learning framework called WHO WHAT HOW. Let us see how we can fit this in that framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introduction to Instructional Design Theories by Shaleen</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/introduction-to-instructional-design-theories/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/introduction-to-instructional-design-theories/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Nice and Informative. The post did help me in clearing some of the things I was drilling.

I find your post descriptive and I think the approach is prescriptive. :-)

Great read.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and Informative. The post did help me in clearing some of the things I was drilling.</p>
<p>I find your post descriptive and I think the approach is prescriptive. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great read.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do we require our own Quality framework? by vbaxi</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>vbaxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It would be great to talk about what companies are doing to foster a culture of high personal quality in all aspects of the worklife. And also what they do to sustain it over long and stressful periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to talk about what companies are doing to foster a culture of high personal quality in all aspects of the worklife. And also what they do to sustain it over long and stressful periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Usability! Usability? Usability:) by Wasim</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/usability-usability-usability/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/usability-usability-usability/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Moving the mouse from bottom to top exerts more pressure in our hands (both for left hander as well as right hander). The X or close/exit/quit button is the least used button on any interface. Also, good practice is to place is separately on the screen as it might get clicked accidentally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving the mouse from bottom to top exerts more pressure in our hands (both for left hander as well as right hander). The X or close/exit/quit button is the least used button on any interface. Also, good practice is to place is separately on the screen as it might get clicked accidentally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Usability! Usability? Usability:) by Abhash</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/usability-usability-usability/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/usability-usability-usability/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Good thought but sometimes I feel - have some companies e.g. Microsoft and Nokia defined the usability or large usage of their products have defined the usability?

Microsoft Products : Why &quot;X&quot; close button always has to be on top right corner? Is their scientific and evaluated reason to do that?

Nokia - Why is it so easy to navigate through nokia mobile phone while in another it takes ages to understand the usability and navigation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thought but sometimes I feel &#8211; have some companies e.g. Microsoft and Nokia defined the usability or large usage of their products have defined the usability?</p>
<p>Microsoft Products : Why &#8220;X&#8221; close button always has to be on top right corner? Is their scientific and evaluated reason to do that?</p>
<p>Nokia &#8211; Why is it so easy to navigate through nokia mobile phone while in another it takes ages to understand the usability and navigation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
