<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we require our own Quality framework?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/</link>
	<description>Shaping learning through ideas...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaleen</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Nice and refreshing read. 

My limited understanding says that most of the quality frame works are plagued by one size fits all.

All leading organizations, such as GE, Motorola, and Sony, known for their quality have adopted some industry-specific framework and modified it for their use.

We have a budding learning framework called WHO WHAT HOW. Let us see how we can fit this in that framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and refreshing read. </p>
<p>My limited understanding says that most of the quality frame works are plagued by one size fits all.</p>
<p>All leading organizations, such as GE, Motorola, and Sony, known for their quality have adopted some industry-specific framework and modified it for their use.</p>
<p>We have a budding learning framework called WHO WHAT HOW. Let us see how we can fit this in that framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vbaxi</title>
		<link>http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>vbaxi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapelearning.wordpress.com/2007/12/13/do-we-require-our-own-quality-framework/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>It would be great to talk about what companies are doing to foster a culture of high personal quality in all aspects of the worklife. And also what they do to sustain it over long and stressful periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to talk about what companies are doing to foster a culture of high personal quality in all aspects of the worklife. And also what they do to sustain it over long and stressful periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
